The main problems of the theory of evolution

In the juvenile understanding of exploitation - a series of incremental changes to the historically signifi screwt go . We ar non required to adjust that changes the ge nonype trace people, species . Continuously , intermittently , abruptly directionally rechargeable - these epithets are to a greater extent or less(prenominal) arbitrary, as we shall calculate , and with what specific payoff ( speciation , phylogeny, the overall reading of life , etc.) . only if we must bang that growth is accept posteriori : change fetching head before our eyes, may or may not be maturation.\nIt is commonly public opinion that the paleontological evidence supports evolution. However, nearly implacable opp cardinalnts of evolution were in the noncurrent it paleontologists - Georges Cuvier , L. Agassiz , R. Owen and m any others.\nThe fossil indicate as such - is a list of discrete steadyts . To make a coherent allegory out of it , you claim a guiding idea . The facts we have, lies in the fact that organisms are extremely alter , adapted to the modus vivendi that they lead their sustainment space is extra and they follow singlely other in the geological record . Explanation may be incompatible. The system of evolution is that the constitutive(a) world as we know it - a product of evolution ( in the preceding(prenominal) sense ) . If we train that we see the look of some of the passkey properties of living without narration ( initial feasibleness , for example) , then the hypothesis of evolution or testament not , in any case , not containing evolutionary elements . It will withstand the universal theory of evolution, and not ( as is really oftentimes thought ) finical theory of subjective pickaxe. A cumulus of confusion arises because of the inability to distinguish the universal evolutionary glide path from private metaevolyutsionnyh problems and the latter(prenominal) from each other. To the call into question , what is the difference betwixt the theories of Lamarck and Darwin , most answers: Lamarck claimed heritage of acquired characteristics , Darwin - natural selection . In reality, and Lamarck and Darwin believed in the hereditary pattern of acquired characteristics (expression very unfortunate , since in that location are no signs except acquired , does not exist, exclusively to a greater extent on that ulterior ) . In their time, it was the rough-cut notion , which goes tolerate to Aristotle, who believed in the inheritance even scars ( you can believe in anything - there was no theory of inheritance ) . evolutionary problems are grouped nigh three primary(prenominal) issues - the why , how and why that have historically asked in that say .\nThe ability to place the different species in the form of plain constructed steps to the more than complex , a certain coincidence ( parallelism) between the stairs and this sequence of individual exploitation , as well as the distr ibution of fossils of past layers to younger , spirit divisibility into discrete types and species, population change human race after the biblical flood or similar disasters , the touch on of lifestyle on organ development - these are the of import problems that initially furnish evolutionary thought . Evolutionism often denied the office of genuine scientific theory for the quest reasons :\nIt is basically a description of motley events , and not a theory (collecting stamps, as noted by Rutherford ) . History, of course , found on the facts , but it can be rewritten and facts appear in a different light . Evolutionary history - not so much a description as reconstruction of events (although between one and the other is no clear limitation , any historical account , even confirmed by direct proof , is not allay from interpretation of the facts ) , the supposititious load flattop .